Genre: Apocalyptic Fiction, Alien Invasion, Vampires, Military SF
Hardcover: 384 pages
Publisher: Tor Books
Publication Date: September 28, 2010
ISBN-10: 0765324121
ISBN-13: 978-0765324122
Author Website: David Weber
The beginning of a new military SF series, Out of the Dark by David Weber combines vampires, military thrillers, and alien invasions for a powerful exploration of human nature and action-packed adventure.
The story begins with a survey expedition from a galactic empire known as the Hegemony. As they watch, the great Battle of Agincourt unfolds before their eyes. But to these herbivorous surveyors, it is incomprehensible that Henry the V would continue to battle against such impossible odds. With this incredulity, Weber sets the entire tone of the novel, which is built around the notion that the omnivorous sentient species known as “humans” is incomprehensible to the largely herbivorous member states of the Hegemony. But there is one exception. The carnivorous Shongarii see an opportunity for expansion and a warrior-slave race in the humans, and they arrive with the intent to conquer the whole of humanity. However, our rapid technological progress in the 1500 years from the time of survey to their arrival takes them by surprise. Where the alien invaders expect a technological society of black powder and steam using industrialism, they find instead our twenty-first century weaponry, similar to and in some cases superior to their own. Earth wide guerilla warfare breaks out when our greatest cities and half of Earth’s population is destroyed in one great barrage of kinetic energy by the invading Shongarii.
The tale follows many different perspectives, including those of the alien commander, some of his subordinates, an extended family of South Carolina survivalists, an American soldier on his way home from Afghanistan who is stranded in Romania, a battalion of U.S. soldiers stuck in Afghanistan, a Russian soldier-engineer, and an F-22 fighter pilot. Each of these perspectives weaves in and out of each other throughout the novel, giving the reader multiple perspectives of the Northern Hemisphere guerilla warfare the humans enact against the dog-like Shongarii.
The story is laced with acronyms for weapons, organizations, and vehicles of the military structure of American and Russian forces. Military enthusiasts and gun lovers will likely eat up the lovingly written descriptions written by Weber of the powerful arsenal of the most industrialized nations of the world. Though at times the acronym dropping and my own lack of gun knowledge led to some of these digressions being distracting, the end effect on even this pacifistic reviewer was to heighten the tension. Would humanity’s guns be enough? How does a human tank stand up against its comparable Shongarii vehicle? Reading Out of the Dark has taught me more about guns, and modern warfare then I ever thought I would know, and I marvel at humanity’s ingenuity and technological prowess (as well as our ability to be the creators of our own destruction).
But the story is not just about the guns. It is also an exploration of the psychology of warfare. One of the primary reasons that humanity is even able to fight back against the pack mentality of the Shongarii is the inability of the Shongarii leadership to understand what drives and motivates us. Weber also looks at the mindset and tactical structures of guerilla warfare, presenting multiple situations in which the humans and Shongarii are pitted against one another in battle. It is this dichotomy of psychology that drives many of the events of the story as the pack mentality comes against the individualism of the human brain. The Shongarii are left in scramble mode as they attempt to subdue a planet of beings unlike any they have ever encountered before.
Most of Out of the Dark is a description of a series of battles, usually from both the perspective of the humans and the Shongarii commanders. Readers may find that the tale is only a series of through descriptions of warfare technology coupled with descriptions of its use in battle. If battle scenes and modern warfare and are not of interest to you, you may find that the majority of this novel is not to your liking.
For those wondering about the vampires, let me just say that though they are an integral (almost deus ex machina) part of the novel, they do not really appear until the story is almost at its end. Fans of vampire stories are not going to find the vampires worked throughout the tale, but rather only find that the second race of sentient beings on Earth comes to the fore only very late in the novel. Weber focuses most of the novel’s energy on the human fight against the Shongarii, on showcasing the indomitable human spirit. And for good reason, as it is this and the vampires combined which give humanity hope that it may be able to win out against the invaders.
Out of the Dark is the tale humanity fighting back with modern weaponry and unique psychology against more a more powerful space-faring race of carnivorous aliens. But even the hunter can become the hunted. It is a spectacular tale, wonderfully complex in the telling, full of all the details that make military thrillers so entertaining with a mix of fantasy (vampires) and science fiction (aliens) that make it unique in content. I for one am highly anticipating a sequel, hopefully with an origin story of the vampire race included, along with a description perhaps of what happened in the Southern Hemisphere of the Earth during the alien attack. Highly, highly recommended fiction for everyone.

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Ottinger and Patty Garcia, scifi stuff. scifi stuff said: RT @johnottinger P: Book Review: Out of the Dark by David Weber http://bit.ly/axOsaa #scifi #fantasy [...]
It is not a stand alone book, though it could be read as one. I think we will be seeing more vampires in space from Weber fairly soon.
An impressive review on an impressive books. I’m far beyond to be a gun nut. The book is on my list and your review gives me enough reasons why I should read it.
Is it definitely a stand alone book?
Hi John, a very thorough and even review on this one. The short teaser in the WARRIORS anthology has me excited to read the novel. I’ve also enjoyed Weber’s SAFEHOLD saga a great deal.
[...] Grasping for the wind: Book Review: Out of the Dark by David Weber [...]
Thanks Rob, I do try. This was the first Weber I had read since THE WAR GOD”S OWN, and now I remember why I like his writing so much.
Great, book. And a very well written review. Kind of wish you had not mentioned the vampires … but you did … but in a “tasteful way”.
Good review!
michael
I just finished this book and I disagree with the positive reviews. I really enjoyed it until the vamps showed up. And then, the book was over. I guess it got me interested enough to check the next book, if there is one, to see how the vampires fare in space. But, I felt like the vampires were tacked onto the end … maybe his publisher asked him to include vampires because they’re so popular. Maybe he just stuck them at the end because he could, sort of an FU to the vampire frenzy in popular media.
I really like this book until the Vampires show up. I read like he couldn’t find a realist way to get the earth out of being destroyed other than have mythical Vampires come out to save the world. Very strange end. I was hoping that the humans would steal some of the teaching machines and find a way to fight the battle in space ships. All through the book humans were trumping the aliens except in space. I am looking forward to the next Safehold book but now I am going to be more careful in buying a Weber book.
I agree with Bradshaw and Tom R. It was a great read, with human characters you wanted to see succeed, aliens who were hell bent on earth’s destruction, and battle scenes I would pay to see on the big screen … until the deus ex machina vampires ending. IMHO, the humans should have gained access to the teaching machines … and because Weber explains human technology had advanced at a relatively unexpected high level when compared to the Shongarii’s past, it would stand to reason that once humanity used the Shongarii teaching machines and began to understand Shongarii technology and tactics, the humans would naturally improve upon that information at an accelerated rate, thus gaining the advantage to overcome the alien invaders. Vampires were the “solution de jour”. If the next book does deal with the invasion in the southern hemisphere, will it be saved by werewolves?!
I think you guys get the essence of why I liked the book, yet had qualms about the ending. Of course, maybe Weber will bring the vampires in better in the sequel.
I totally agree that this book was good until the end. The last 10 pages and the whole vampire thing made it laugh out loud BAD (and I have witnesses to the fact that I did laugh out loud). I thoroughly enjoy most of David’s other writing, and especially Safehold, but this story should never have happened. How this made it past an editor or a publisher is beyond me. I am so glad I got this one from the library and didn’t spend any money on it. Sorry, David. Go back and work on the series you’re already in the middle of, please…
I just finished the book and up until the point that the Vampires were introduced I was enjoying it, not as much as David’s other works but still it was interesting enough. Now however, I’m going to get a little snarky, if I want to read about Vampires I’ll take a look at Anne Rice or Stephenie Meyer if I want Vampires without any substance.
I don’t buy David Weber books because I want to see an author sellout and try and cash in on fad fiction. David you’d best remember that people come to you for “Science Fiction” not “Science Junk Food”. I understand that you had intended the Harrington character to have gone out in a blaze of glory defending Manticore but you kind of sold out there as well. You should have stuck to you own storyline and brought that series to a conclusion as you had intended instead of dragging it out and loosing your focus.
You could then have say taken a leap forward and continued on with that universe or simply allowed it to end and be acknowledged as your best series and moved on to other areas of interest. Back to “Out of the Dark”, you could have made this some sort of technological effect from some shadow member of the Hedgemony. Or of a protectorate society of a much older star fairing race that had taken humanity under its wing fostering our fast technological development in an effort to thwart the dictotorial methods of the Hedgemony. Or any of a hundred different twists but to reach up a very dark place and pull out Vampires? come on man you’re better than that and we as your loyal fans deserved better. Thumbs down on this one David.
This book had an interesting premise but I was not impressed with the execution. I was excited to read about the alien invasion and how humans fought back but I felt like Weber painted himself into a corner and then decided to the only way to escape was on bat wings. The vampire ending was not impressive at all and when it became apparent that he had decided to go that way I almost put the book down (but there were only a couple pages to go so I stuck it out).
I also was not impressed with his portrayal of women. As he has done in his Safehold series the women in this book, though almost supernaturally competent (but not in the vampire sense), inevitably give up all initiative and direction to their men. They shoot better at the gun range but in the action of the book they stay home and watch the kids. The female alien is smarter than all the rest of the aliens but is subservient to her male master. One woman manages to keep herself and her three children alive through the disaster just until she finds a strong, heroic male to save her and watch over her kids.
I don’t expect every woman to be a hero or even a major character but it becomes apparent that of late Weber feels they are fine standing in the background behind the men. This seems particularly odd in light of the Honor Harrington series but perhaps he just felt a change was in order.
I do not recommend this book. I think the time could be better spent reading something else.
Vampires? Freaking VAMPIRES?!?
In general, the story was solid – not great, but solid. The premise of aliens being surprised by human ingenuity and technological prowess isn’t new, but it’s not overdone by any means. The aliens musing about human place-names got a little tired, and I wondered if the book’s editor read it very closely or counted on Weber’s name to sell the book. But, again, it wasn’t a bad read. Until the end. And then it went horribly, horribly wrong. Bringing vampires into the book at the end reeked of desperation. I would love to know what Weber or his editor was thinking.
Unfortunately, I bought the damn book… it’s already in my pile to take to Half-Price Books.
I really enjoyed the Honor Harrington series and when I saw this travesty at the library yesterday I grabbed it. What a rip off – Weber started writing a reasonably good alien invasion story (of the Military Science Fiction genre) – that’s if you can handle mega-super-competent Americans thrashing dopey space invaders. When the the story got to about page 330 out of 380 with no conclusion in sight I thought this must be book one of a trilogy – but must’ve got tired at that point and thought “Quick! I’ve got to finish it” and lo and behold the Vampire Deus ex Machina saved the day!
I’m with the mob.
I was enjoying this up untill the horrid and pointless deux ex machina of the “vampires save the world” The introduction of the fantasy element to the end of a lengthy hard military (almost mil-porn) SF novel was jarring and “suspension of disblief” ended up in tinkly bits on the floor.
I am given to understand that this was an expansion of a short story. And at SS length, the idea is at least CLEVER. But after investing the world building and character narrative of a novel – is STUPID. And I respect library books too much to fling them across the room. But the entire family heard the resounding “ARRRRRRRRGH!!!!” when I got to the last chapter.
I hear you. Really, really good novel until the deus ex machina. All this great build-up and then splat!
I am a big David Weber fan especially the Safehold series, but I was very let down by the ending. Vampires, really. and not just vampires but super unstopable vampires. Please don’t ruin your safehold series in a similar way.
Very glad I didn’t read this review before reading the book, have you never heard the term “spoiler”?
Beef #1. Like other readers I had the same reaction to the vampire resolution. I, too, was tempted to toss the book across the room. I was even disappointed with the preamble. As a basis for the action to follow, I get it. I get Agincourt ( or Azincourt as B. Cornwell says in a far better description of the battle which is in all its essential aspects related the same ). A cautionary tale? Hey, aliens don’t mess with us humans. We risk the odds and when our backs are really to the wall we go for broke. The history of the battle of Agincourt is far more interesting than this book turns out to be, and the way in which DW relates it using a whole 24 pgs is both indulgence and unnecessary. And why wouldn’t human technology have advanced well past sword and longbow in 500 years? ( Unless you live in the George R.R. Martin universe, that is! )
Beef #2. Every alien perspective digression where the puppies discuss what makes humans so different from other species, blah, blah, blah. BORING! Weber has done this sort of crap before, ( in the second to last HH installment he discussed the ramifications of a certain event at great length no less than three times albeit from different perspectives each time ) and just about every book he’s written in the last ten years does the same thing—don’t get me started on the Armegeddon Reef series; to say that tripe is total crap would be far too kind—prime examples of page padding. Entertainment it ain’t. I skimmed so many pages I got vertigo.
Beef #3. Do we really have to experience the same battle sequence written six different and not so different ways with the same resolution each time? The puppies are no match for human weapons, tactics and determination. OK, point taken, now move on to something else.
Beef #4 It boggles the mind that if the aliens had wanted to snatch up a hundred or so humans they couldn’t have done so whenever they wanted to. There are just far too many convenient plot twists. The protagonists don’t have to work for anything. All they need is handed to them by the author.
If there is to be another ( or several ) book(s) in this series count me out. I’ll be turning over my copy of Out of the Dark to my friendly neighbourhood second hand book store at my earliest possible convenience.
If you want to check out some reasonably innovative SF writing, check this guy out. http://gabriel-darke-epublishing.com/ There are even some nice images to look at.
I just finished reading this book and I was so disappointed with the ending I HAD to find someplace to vent.
Vampires??!! ReallY?? Is that the best Mr. Weber could do? Science-fiction turns horror-fantasy? As inept as the aliens seemed, I was willing to buy psycho-sociological differences in species development as a plausible excuse. But the only way the author could figure out for us to win, especially after all the herioc actions of “normal” people facing “abnormal” circumstances…was Vampires??? I guess he wrote himself into a corner and coldn’t figure out any other way to save humanity from utter destruction at the hands of an alien enemy except by using fantasy creatures.
Extremely lame, Mr. Weber. As a fan of your prior work I am very, very disappointed. I think I’ll be a little more careful before buying another of your books.
I finished reading Out of the Dark last night and immediately thought of Robert Ludlum, whose books were fun and exciting until the end, and then they just … ended. I stopped reading Robert Ludlum, and if David Weber, whom I have enjoyed very much, writes any more of these crappy endings he will be on the list of authors I used to read.
Vampires? Really? Why not zombies or ghosts, or even Smurfs(tm)? David Weber needs to re-assess what genre he’s writing. I certainly hope he’s not planning on expanding on this story line, or I may have to find another favorite author.
Ok, I figured it out … the reason Weber took an ending with “Vampires”. Really brilliant. He is going to have a 2nd Edition with a different ending? So, we can all purchase the book again! It was a great book, one of my favorites, up until the ending!
I will look forward to Version 2.0.
Michael
It was rather like a re-imagined version of Niven & Pournelle’s ‘Footfall’ – though with considerably smaller scope and truly ludicrous Deus ex ending. I’ve enjoyed a lot of David Weber’s work – even persisting with the Honor Harrington series despite its descent into reproduction of tedious meeting memos – but this one was definitely spoiled by the ending.
Part way through I thought I’d cleverly figured the way humanity would defeat the genocidal aliens (something involving use of captured shuttles to reach the orbital fleet) – but no; though I did feel it coming with the various Romanian references the vampire thing was a ringing dissappointment.
I’m wondering if this is the “Falling Skies” template? … So far no vampires.