Or… The New York Times Book Review Hates YOU, but I Don’t;
Or… Why Where Your Book Gets Shelved Determines Your Intelligence, Work-Ethic and Value to Society
Read Part 1 at SF Signal
Read Part 2 at Debuts and Reviews
Or do, but recognize the risk you’re taking.
Tia Nevitt wrote an interesting piece a short while ago, in which she gave advice to aspiring writers. I suggest you read it.
You’ll note that she offers advice principally to those writers about to embark on the great journey of authorship. And much of what she suggests is spot on. You SHOULD try to ride the wave of whatever the new popular thing is, if you can see the wave building. Trying to find a new hook on an old but popular subject is a great idea. And absolutely avoid, if at all possible, starting a book on a dying theme. I know, sometimes you just can’t help yourself. But these are all things to keep in mind if you hope ever to get your imaginative fiction published. But I want to offer a caveat based on all that we have been talking about above. And that is the first line of this now overwrought and over-thought essay.
So why shouldn’t you mix your genres? After all, some of the greatest works of art come from taking disparate themes and finding ways in which they work together. Thesis – antithesis – synthesis, right? Hey, I’m on your side. If I have been praised for anything, it has been my willingness to combine seemingly unrelated genres, including historical, fantasy, western, YA and (shudder) ‘literary’. I dearly love books that blur the edges, that make you see the fantasy in a six-gun as much as in a sword. I can’t for the life of me understand why a book’s having young protagonists makes it YA. And I believe that a great many of the tools of my ‘literary’ education can and should be appropriated for an imaginative audience.
Besides, you may well say, there are all sorts of books that have stood between genres and done fantastically well! Twilight (horror and YA), The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay (‘literary’ and fantasy), “The Dark Tower (fantasy, western, horror, romance), and all of Neil Gaiman’s books. Right you are, as usual! But again, this is a list of books for which things turned out all right. What about those books – some of which might be just great – that stand between genres, but you never heard of them? What happened to those books?
The thing is, if you write between genres you are pressing the buttons of prejudice in not one group, but in many groups, and maybe in all groups! You take the chance that bookstores are going to shelve you in a place where the readers who might have loved your work will be unable to find it (their zombie feet having taken them to some other section of the store). You inflict cover problems on yourself and your publisher, making it difficult to know how exactly to attract the eye of potential buyers (should it have a fantasy cover – metal bikini and all – or a romance cover – shirtless man embracing lady love on beach? It can’t be everything!). Reviewers on all sides may object to the very heart of your project, because they dislike one aspect. Others might make the assumption that it was never meant for them, and so not give it the time of day. You may, to make a long story short, find yourself slipping between fan-bases, and so between the cracks.
And who will help you pull yourself out? Sorry, but the fact is, unless you are already successful beyond the dreams of avarice, or somehow got a HUGE advance – which means that you are almost surely one of those overpaid ‘literary’ types discussed previously – most publishers simply do not have the personnel or patience necessary to make a long-term commitment to a book. Big publishers will normally devote about two weeks to a book, at which point they expect the blasted thing to be selling left and right, no more publicity needed. Big print media either reviews a book within that short time frame or it won’t look at it at all (I have never understood that, have you? A book about Theodore Roosevelt is just the same, whether read now or a year from now. And it’s just as obtainable as well. But I guess there’s no reason to throw logic upon the NYTBR now, is there?). Worst of all, for we lovers of imaginative literature, is the investment most publishing houses are now making in the realm of internet publicity – namely, virtually none whatever. At a symposium I attended not so long ago, a group of publicists from some major houses told the writers and agents present that they would no longer take any part in online publicity, that all internet activity would be left entirely up to authors. But if you are not on the ‘literary’ side, there is virtually NO publicity that is NOT on-line publicity. So what happens to the wonderful book by the little old man who has absolutely no computer or internet savvy? I think we all know the answer. Nothing happens to that book. It sits on shelves for a month, maybe two, and then is gone just as surely as if it had never been. We don’t even get a chance to judge whether it was any good. We’ve never heard of it.
So do yourself a favor and stay right in the middle of the publishing industry’s wheel-house. Throw them a nice fat pitch they can hit over the center-field wall. Give them a book with an obvious cover and a story that is immediately recognizable; one that won’t offend liberal New England schoolmarms with its depictions of guns or violence, or conservative Southern aristocrats and Western individualists with any themes suggesting ecological conservation or multicultural understanding. If at all possible, make your book ‘literary.’ That will ensure you the chance of at least one big payday. And if you just can’t force yourself to do that, then sell it as the opening volume of some long-running and meandering series. And for the love of all that’s holy, don’t write a book that blends western, fantasy, ’literary,’ YA, adventure, multi-cultural and historical fiction, like this one purports to do. It is just too much work convincing potential readers that there might be something in there that they would like.
Of course, maybe you’ll want to do that work. It is rewarding, believe me, to chase after that “synthesis” you thought of earlier. As a writer between genres you can be your own boss, ignoring and embracing the usual tropes and traditions of the movements in whose shadows you walk. You can work toward a uniquely American vision of fantasy, horror, or romance – casting off the shackles of the old world with a shout of “Live Free or Die!” Or you can damn America with your metaphor. You have the chance to write your way through uncharted territory, to say something ABOUT literature, both imaginative and ‘literary.’ At times you may even astonish yourself. And there is a great thrill whenever someone says to you – ‘I was so surprised by your novel. It wasn’t what I thought it would be at all.’
If you want to embark on such a journey, don’t say I didn’t warn you. And heck, you might wake up one morning and find yourself famous and rich beyond your wildest dreams. It COULD happen (probably won’t, but why not dream?). Should you decide that is your path, go forth with my best wishes for luck and happiness. And when your book comes out, send me a note. I will be the first in line to buy it!
By way of closing, let me say only that the above essay was written exclusively for the purposes of entertainment, and not as some call to take up arms in defense of the little guys of imaginative fiction. In no wise do I advocate the bloody overthrow of the New York Times Book Review, big publishing houses, chain bookstore executives, or reviewers of any denomination (Of course, if you have an army of robots and a secret lair from which you are ready to launch them, please let me know!).
I only advocate keeping your eyes and ears open and keeping your own prejudices in check as much as you possibly can. I shall certainly try to do so myself.
Justin was born in Boise, Idaho in 1974. He graduated from Boise State University with a degree in philosophy, and from Columbia University with an MFA in fiction. He is the author, most recently, of “Year of the Horse,” an all-ages fantasy-western that tells the story of sixteen-year-old Yen Tzu-lu, the child of Chinese immigrants and one of a band of treasure hunters brought together from every corner of the continent to recapture a stolen gold mine. Leading Tzu-Lu and his gang is the gunslinger Jack Straw, a figure who is as much legend as reality, as much magic as lead. Ultimately, this band of outsiders finds it must learn to live together, trust and care for one another. If they make it across a wild continent, they’ll be rich; if they don’t, they’ll surely be dead. Get your copy at Indiebound (why not support your local store?), BN.com, or Amazon.com.
Justin is roughly six feet tall, weighs somewhere around 185 pounds (often more, to his chagrin), has dark-brown hair and eyes, and suffers from near-sightedness, motion-sickness, and a tendency to get angry at airport personnel. His wife, Day Mitchell, a licensed master social worker, is trying to help him overcome this last item, but finds the going hard.
He can be contacted via justin-allen.com.
Related posts:


















































[...] Read a original: Part 3: A Manifesto of Imaginative Literature by Justin Allen … [...]
Hey All,
Welcome to the finish line. The official end and comment thread. I hope you had a good time with this. That’s ultimately what it’s about.
But if you have any comments, questions or concerns, you can voice those here. Maybe you have a book that has been mostly overlooked, and you can’t believe it? Or maybe you are worried about what publicity and marketing will be like when you publish…? Anything you want to discuss, we can. You can even make a negative comment, of course, though I may not respond to it. This is meant to be a celebration of the artistic in Imaginative Literature, not a bitch session (no matter how I may come off for the purposes of the essay).
Justin
How is Chabon’s The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay between literary and fantasy? What about it was anything close to fantasy? I read it a few months ago, and as far as I remember, it was purely a historical fiction novel set during the Golden Age of superhero comics.
Hi David,
Thanks for chiming in. And I am glad that your real and historical world is so fantastical for you. I didn’t really mean any of the examples to be exhaustive or singular. If you don’t think Kavalier and Clay, with its escape artists, golems and scenes written in comic-book-ese, is fantastic, then I suggest you insert instead one of Chabon’s other books – The Yiddish Policeman’s Union or Gentlemen of the Road will likely do. And if those are still not fantastic enough, how about Susannah Clarke’s Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrel – hopefully that will do just fine…
Think of those kinds of details as choose your own adventure.
Interestingly, some of my favorite books are mixes of genres. Diana Gabaldon’s Outlander was a nonstandard romance, and a historical novel, and a fantasy-based time travel novel all at once. They decided to shelve it with the romances and it turned out to be a very good thing for Diana Gabaldon.
I love mixes of genres. Hey, I have an idea! They can devote a section of the bookstore to genre mixes.
In a way, this is exactly what I am talking about throughout the essay. Another book it has never even occurred to me to read, or even look into. Why? Because it is a “romance.” Really, maybe it is just that “I” need to be better. You think? Likely that is true.
By the way, at Tia shows us, this game need not be played only with books that are obscure, merely with books that defied your expectation of ‘genre,’ surprised you a bit maybe, and made you feel lucky to have taken a chance on a book you might not normally have given the time of day.
Justin, great set of posts, really a fun read. A sad, but fascinating look into the world of publishing a novel. I knew it was tough, but damn. Some of my favorites are genre-benders! Neal Stephenson’s works pop to mind immediately, but there are many, many more, some of which are already classics!
Hey Jeff,
Thanks for looking us up. Classics more often than not sit between genres, it seems to me. At least between ‘genres’ as we see them today. I have some theories about that, but nothing that would give us any sense of a way forward… and that’s what we all really need, a way forward.
@Justin
Yes, please! A way forward!
I love bookstores, (mmm, that new book smell!) but I haven’t walked into one in months, maybe more, for this very reason. I find myself doing the same thing you do, zombie-walking into SF & Fantasy. Yet those very Neal Stephenson novels I mention, 3 of them are more “historical fiction” than they are fantasy, but they feature elements that go far beyond that genre. But they’re definitely not on the “historical fiction” shelves, last I checked.
A very thought-provoking essay. Well done!
Something I think it’s important to consider about genre-bending books is that they can sometimes become a genre of their own–a wonderful and well-loved genre which never would have come to be if not for those brave genre-bending pioneers. Horror, for example, is an outgrowth of the fantasy tradition, with its fantastic creatures and paranormal frights. I see the same thing with steampunk. Steampunk is a hot new trend right now, but someone had to be the first to blend fantasy, science fiction, and the industrial age. Literature grows and changes, and it is just this sort of thing which gives rise to the genres of tomorrow. It’s not a bad thing. It’s a process. Change–and genre bending–make the literary world go round.
Hi Katie,
Glad you dropped a line. You are quite right. I have always thought that all fiction in the western canon come from Homer. Fantasy, Poetry, Literature, Romance. That dude has it all! And in abundance. Over the years, of course, people have learned to specialize in one or another aspect of what is possible in writing. The mistake we make, I believe, is in believing that because you focus on one aspect, all other aspects are inferior or beneath your notice.
And Jeff,
Thanks for the shout-out for zombie feet. I too have always loved book stores. A reader on the first site mistakenly believes that I am somehow against bookstores – or even stranger, against cover artists. I am not against either. I am against the idea that by loving a certain type of book, we have to hate other types.
[...] Part 3 at Grasping for Wind [...]
[...] Read Part 3 and Official Comment Thread at Grasping for the Wind [...]
[...] can find the first part over at SF Signal, the second at Debuts and Reviews and the third at Grasping for the Wind. You should definitely take a read of these and then leave your comments at Grasping for the [...]
Thanks Justin Allen. I like it because literature is most favorite subject.